HUMANITY – THE NEW SUPREME BEING:SOCIAL LIBERALISM

stirner 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

The liberal state is inherently unstable because of the contradiction between its professed values of equality, freedom, and universal welfare against the harsh reality of class inequality.

The instability caused by class inequality provides a foundation for supplanting political liberalism with social liberalism, or the replacement of classical liberalism with socialism and communism.

 

Under political liberalism, persons are theoretically equal under the law, but their possessions are not. The inequality of possessions threatens social stability and the fulfillment of the humanist agenda since the proletariat may decide to resist the class structure of political liberalism.

 

Social liberalism is the term Stirner gives to the socialist, communist, and collectivist anarchist theories and movements that attempt to organize the working class and overthrow the regime of political liberalism. The writings and advocacy of pre-Marxian collectivists such as Moses Hess, Williamm Weitling, and Pierre-Joseph Proudhon were particularly important statements of social liberalism at the time Stirner prepared The Ego and Its Own .

 

In Stirner’s dialectical egoist critique, political libera lism responds to the decay of monarchy and the aristocracy by arguing that no one must give orders, no one must command except a government which derives its legitimacy from popular sovereignty.

 

Social liberal ism responds to the inequality of classes by arguing that no one must own anything. Under the regime of social liberalism, not only does the state obtain a monopoly in the legitimate use of force, society alone obtains the right to possess property.

 

Social liberalism abhors the use of state power to protect a person’s property since property enforces social boundaries on the possession and use of material objects. Political liberalism supports the right to own property and enforces this right through the use or the threat of the use of force.

 

The person who wants “more things” and discovers that others have “more things,” also finds that access to “more things” is under the control of other people. The contradiction of political liberalism is that no one is supposed to be inferior. No one is supposed to be able to command others.

 

The lordship-bondage relationship should have been destroyed . But some people have what other people would like to have. A “circuitously restored inequality” appeared under the regime of political liberalism.

 

The freedom of individuals from the domination by others falls short under political liberalism because private property means that some persons have the right to command and control the lives of others. Social liberalism intends to build on the accomplishments of the democratic revolutions by extending the principles of democracy and equality into the economy and the social class system.

 

The solution of the social liberals is to discredit justifications for private property and to have the democratic state assert ownership of property through coercion. The solution of the social liberals, Stirner taunts, is forbid anyone from having anything any longer. Reduce everyone to the status of a pauper. Dispossess everyone of everything. Only the state, acting on behalf of society, can legitimately own property. The solution propounded by the social liberals is to eliminate all legitimate boundaries between “mine” and “thine.” All property is to be impersonal. No individual can legitimately assert or claim ownership over anything.

 

 

The state of social liberalism is tasked with creating “ragamuffins” and “nullities.” Persons are to become “ragamuffins together.” Society is to become a “ragamuffin crew.” The purpose of the political class is to enforce “ragamuffinism” throughout the nation.

 

For Stirner, this was the second great robbery of the personal in the interest of humanity. The second robbery is the appropriation of the possessions of individuals by the state on behalf of society. In the theory and practice of social liberalism, the liberal democratic state is obliged to appropriate possessions to ensure that people are not unequal in their possessions. Social liberalism intends to abolish class inequality, the inequality of possessions, the distinction between rich and poor, bourgeois and proletarian.

 

Stirner says that this is achieved through the impoverishment or pauperization of all. Property is taken from individuals and surrendered to the ghostly society.

 

 

PASSEGGIATA SULLA CIRCONFERENZA

CIORAN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DENTRO AL CERCHIO CHE RINCHIUDE GLI ESSERI UMANI IN UNA COMUNIONE DI INTERESSI E DI SPERANZE, LO SPIRITO NEMICO DEI MIRAGGI SI APRE UNA STRADA DAL CENTRO VERSO LA PERIFERIA. NON PUÒ PIÙ UDIRE DA VICINO IL BRULICHIO DEGLI UOMINI: VUOLE GUARDARE DA PIÙ LONTANO POSSIBILE LA SIMMETRIA MALEDETTA CHE LI COLLEGA.

  Continue reading

LES MAÎTRES DE LA TERRE

LES MAÎTRES DE LA TERRE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pour mieux comprendre ce que Nietzsche entend par son phantasme vaticinant des « Maîtres de la Terre », on aimerait savoir quels seront les « esclaves » de pareils maîtres.

La réponse à la seconde question, Nietzsche la semble donner lui-même lorsqu’il demande à son tour : « Où sont les maîtres pour lesquels travaillent tous ces esclaves ? » Ce qui veut dire que la société industrielle ne se conçoit pas sans une généralisation du caractère « fonctionnel », c’est-à-dire « productif »et, par conséquent, mercantile qu’elle exige de toutes les activités.

Continue reading

THE SELF-OVERCOMING OF NIHILISM:FROM LIBERALISM TO EGOISM

KEIJJI

 

 

 

 

 

 

The curtain came down on ancient history when the world ceased to be seen as divine. The self as spirit became master of the world and conquered it as its own possession. There God appeared as theHoly: “Al l things have been delivered to me by my Father” (Matthew 11 :27) [po 941102] . Thus the self became master of the world but did not become master of its own ideal, since the spirit was sacralized as “Holy Spirit.” A Christian “without the world” could not yet become a person “without God.” If the battle during the ancient period had been waged against the world, the medieval Christian battle was fought against the self itself. The battleground shifted from outside the self to within it.

  Continue reading

THE UNABOMBER MANIFESTO:AUTONOMY

THE UNABOMBER MANIFESTO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

42. Autonomy as a part of the power process may not be necessary for every individual. But most people need a greater or lesser degree of autonomy in working toward their goals. Their efforts must be undertaken on their own initiative and must be under their own direction and control. Yet most people do not have to exert this initiative, direction and control as single individuals. It is usually enough to act as a member of a small group.

  Continue reading

DEAD GOD:SOLAR ANUS

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

 

 

 

 

 

Bataille ends an early article entitled ‘Propositions’ with the words: ‘the true universality is the death of God’. He is insistent, throughout the entire sweep of his work, that the death of God, as announced in Nietzsche’s The Gay Science, is to be thought of as a religious event, indeed, as the positive end of religion (as zero).

  Continue reading

PROYECTO DE UN NUEVO MODO DE VIVIR

UROBURO 4

 

 

 

 

 

 

Con eso se indica: el ente en su totalidad está dominado por la in-nocencia [Un-schuld]. La totalidad es αιών. Es prácticamente imposible traducir esta palabra de manera adecuada. Alude a la totalidad del mundo, pero, a la vez, tomada como tiempo y referida por medio de éste a nuestra «vida», alude al transcurso vital mismo. Se suele determinar el significado de αιών del siguiente modo: Eon alude al «tiempo» del «cosmos», es decir de la naturaleza, que se mueve en el tiempo que mide la física. De este tiempo se distingue el tiempo de nuestras «vivencias».

  Continue reading

NIETZSCHE: POLÍTICAS DEL NOMBRE PROPIO

NIETZCHE 4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Que nos enseña Nietzsche

El nombre de Nietzsche designa, actualmente, en Occidente al único (posiblemente, aunque de otra manera, junto con Kierkegaard, y asimismo con Freud) que abordó la filosofía y la vida, la ciencia y la filosofía de la vida con su nombre, en su nombre. El único, posiblemente, que puso en juego su nombre sus nombres y sus biografías. Con casi todos los riesgos que esto conlleva: para “el”, para “ellos”, para sus vidas, sus nombres y su porvenir, especialmente el porvenir político de aquello cuya firma asumió.

  Continue reading

THE PHILOSOPHY OF EGOISM XI

STIRNER 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

The suggestion has been heard that if all acts are Egoistic this term has no distinctive meaning.

The same thing has often been said as to “matter” when the Materialist has affirmed that there is no ” spirit, “-no opp osi te of matter. Matter then becomes synonymous simply with existence.

  Continue reading

Page 158 of 161
1 156 157 158 159 160 161