SOBRE A INTERPRETAÇÃO DELEUZIANA DE NIETZSCHE:INTRA-EXTRATEXTUALIDADE

DELUZIANA

O texto nietzschiano comporta uma diversidade de possibilidadesem termos de interpretação, pois, ao invés de formular proposições ine-quívocas, cujo corolário seria evidente, apresenta-se como algo a serdecifrado. Mas o decifrar não implica, no caso, o estabelecimento deelementos precisos, mas de elementos possíveis. Com isso, o decifrarfica, aqui, como um exercício de experimentação em que cada elementoencontrado abre novas possibilidades de combinação no sentido de in-terpretação e, portanto, experimentação com o próprio pensar.

Continue reading

DELEUZE VERSUS HEGEL

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m6e8bxWO8W1qda9hso1_1280.jpg

There are those who still understand Deleuze to say that individuals and persons must be fixed and numerically distinct substances.  They say there must be negative forces of opposition among these individual singularities.  They threaten that if there are not these structural-relational forces of negative difference, then we would fall into an undifferentiated black nothingness without any difference at all.  How many times does Deleuze tell us that his ‘difference’ has nothing to do with this alternative!?  Deleuze warns us time and again of an illusory alternative that Representational thought presents to us:  either there is difference which is a difference of negation (opposition or limitation), or we have to settle for an undifferenciated abyss (a black nothingness).  Deleuze rejects this alternative of either undifferentiated unformed matter or differentiated formed matter. Rather, to find ‘difference’, we must reach a field of unformed matter that is itself, differentiated..

Continue reading

ON NIETZSCHEAN ETHICS

ON NIETZSCHEAN ETHICS

Ethics, Not Genealogy

One currently widespread stream of interpretation, begun by Gilles Deleuze and popularized by Michel Foucault, insists that Nietzsche had no interest in traditional ethics, but was instead primarily engaged in a groundbreaking new form of social inquiry by the name of “genealogy.”This understanding of “genealogy” as the keystone of Nietzsche’s philosophy, however, has not withstood critical scrutiny.

Continue reading

STRUCTURE OF INTER-RELATED AND ARBITRARY RELATIONS

INTER-RELATED AND ARBITRARY RELATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

WHAT DO WE MEAN WHEN WE POSE THE QUESTION, “WHAT IS LAW?”

To be sure, the canonical tradition of Western legal-philosophical thought proffers a wide variety of answers. In brief summary, law is “transcendental nonsense,” it is “what courts do in fact;”

Continue reading